top of page
搜尋

Understanding Streaming and Copyright: A Comparison of the United States and EuropeanRegimes

  • 作家相片: Thomas Y. Lu
    Thomas Y. Lu
  • 2018年5月1日
  • 讀畢需時 1 分鐘

Abstract:

What are the legal risks when entrepreneurs or business units start their online streaming businesses in the United States and in the European Union regimes? We posit here that legal risks are both substantive and procedural. Both risks come from the recent decisions of the United States district courts, Supreme Court, or from the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”). By comparing the U.S. and the European legal regimes, we can find the similarities between the two —briefly and broadly stated, they protect copyright holders. Because of the broad protection, the substantive risks are shifted to online streaming businesses. Procedurally, the online streaming businesses have to understand the differences between the two regimes. They have to provide enough factual evidence in the pleading stage of the U.S. and to be concerned about legislative adoption in member states of the E.U. These risks can be lowered by the development of a business model where all stakeholders benefit. Also, providing adequate terms of use in the platform is critical to escape liability when infringement occurs. Finally, when confronting lawsuits, managers and legal counsels should hire and cooperate with local lawyers so that they can lower the risk of high damage costs.


Link: https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/jbtl/vol13/iss2/3

 
 
 

最新文章

查看全部
代言與社群媒體影響者的潛在法律責任分析—以美國法為例

摘要: 本文所探求之問題在於:在網路與社 群媒體興起的時代,代言人或社群媒體影 響者所可能面臨的法律風險有哪些?而提 供他們從事代言行為的平台商也會有連帶 負責的風險嗎?透過了解網路與社群媒體 的經營模式,我們會發現這些新媒體所產 生的法律風險與過去傳統媒體所產生的法...

 
 
 
綑綁行為的法律與經濟分析-以美國高通案為例

摘要: 本文在美國高通案的基礎上,來探究綑綁回扣行為在違反或符合反托拉斯法的情形下對消費者的影響為何。多數過去的經濟文獻僅討論產品與產品間的綑綁行為,而沒有考慮專利授權與產品間的綑綁情形。因此,這些文獻並無法合理地說明類似高通案的綑綁回扣行為是否對消費者不利,並進而違反托拉...

 
 
 

Comentários


文章: Blog2_Post

©2020 by 盧 憶(Thomas Y. Lu). Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page